Research has found that IQ predicted leadership skills when the tests weregiven under low-stress conditions, but
under high-stress conditions, IQ wasnegatively correlated with leadership – that is, it predicted the opposite.
①Such standardized tests may not assess all the important elementsnecessary to succeed in school and in life, argues Robert J. Sternberg.
②In his article “How Intelligent Is Intelligence Testing?”, Sternberg notesthat traditional test best assess analytical and verbal skills but fail tomeasure creativity and practical knowledge, components also critical to problemsolving and life success.
③Moreover, IQ tests do not necessarily predict so well once populations orsituations change.
④Research has found that IQ predicted leadership skills when the tests weregiven under low-stress conditions, but under high-stress conditions, IQ wasnegatively correlated with leadership – that is, it predicted the opposite.
⑤Anyone who has toiled
through SAT will testify that test-taking skill alsomatters, whether it’s knowing when to guess or what questions to skip.
参考译文
①(论点：总)罗伯特·J·斯特恩伯格认为，这种尺度化测试或许其实不能评估对付学业和糊口的乐成来讲必需的所有首要身分。
②(详细：分1)斯特恩伯格在他的“智力测试有多大可托度?”一文中指出，传统的智商测试可以或许很好地评估阐发能力和说话能力，但不克不及评估缔造能力和实践能力，而这两个身分对付解决问题和在糊口中获得乐成也相当首要。
③(并列：分2)别的，一旦测试群体或情形产生扭转，智商测试不必定能做出正确的展望。
④(成果：分3)钻研发明，在压力小的情况下举行测试，智商可以或许准确地反应出带领能力的凹凸;可是在压力大的环境下，智商与带领能力呈负相干瓜葛——也就是说，按照智商分数展望出的带领能力与现实环境相反。
⑤(并列：分4)任何加入过“学术评估考试”的人均可以证实，应试技术也很首要，好比晓得什么时候应当猜想或甚么标题可以略过不答。
更多内容请延续存眷考研网。
